<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for journopig: monitoring the media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://journopig.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://journopig.com</link>
	<description>Analysing the British media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:19:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on General Election 2010: The Man Who Hopes To Oust Cameron by Journopig</title>
		<link>http://journopig.com/2010/03/09/general-election-2010-the-man-who-hopes-to-oust-cameron/#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>Journopig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journopig.com/?p=865#comment-364</guid>
		<description>Well, indeed - you&#039;re getting some publicity! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, indeed &#8211; you&#8217;re getting some publicity! <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on General Election 2010: The Man Who Hopes To Oust Cameron by Paul Wesson</title>
		<link>http://journopig.com/2010/03/09/general-election-2010-the-man-who-hopes-to-oust-cameron/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wesson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journopig.com/?p=865#comment-363</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s only one thing worse than being talked about and that&#039;s not being talked about.

Thanks for the analysis.  I am going to redo certain aspects of my website and expand my policies in time for the election (assuming the 6th May is still the date). 

It&#039;s always an uphill struggle being an Independent, but, win or lose, at least I can say that I have tried.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s only one thing worse than being talked about and that&#8217;s not being talked about.</p>
<p>Thanks for the analysis.  I am going to redo certain aspects of my website and expand my policies in time for the election (assuming the 6th May is still the date). </p>
<p>It&#8217;s always an uphill struggle being an Independent, but, win or lose, at least I can say that I have tried.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on General Election 2010: The Man Who Hopes To Oust Cameron by Adam Westbrook</title>
		<link>http://journopig.com/2010/03/09/general-election-2010-the-man-who-hopes-to-oust-cameron/#comment-362</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Westbrook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journopig.com/?p=865#comment-362</guid>
		<description>As it happens I was *this* close  to running myself and making a documentary about it. Couldn&#039;t get a team together in time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As it happens I was *this* close  to running myself and making a documentary about it. Couldn&#8217;t get a team together in time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on General Election 2010: The Man Who Hopes To Oust Cameron by Journopig</title>
		<link>http://journopig.com/2010/03/09/general-election-2010-the-man-who-hopes-to-oust-cameron/#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator>Journopig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 10:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journopig.com/?p=865#comment-361</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t know you were a local boy, Adam!

Yes, we quite agree that more people should run as candidates, but like we say - it&#039;s hard to get anywhere if you want to be independent, because you may not have the financial and PR support that candidates for mainstream parties have. You&#039;ve got to have a tough skin, a willingness to beg for donations, and an acceptance of the fact that you may well come last... 

There are many, including us, who would be interested in getting involved, but who aren&#039;t willing to face all of those facts. Hence our admiration for the likes of Mr Wesson, the libertarian mummer, who is willing to proceed despite his lack of party affiliation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t know you were a local boy, Adam!</p>
<p>Yes, we quite agree that more people should run as candidates, but like we say &#8211; it&#8217;s hard to get anywhere if you want to be independent, because you may not have the financial and PR support that candidates for mainstream parties have. You&#8217;ve got to have a tough skin, a willingness to beg for donations, and an acceptance of the fact that you may well come last&#8230; </p>
<p>There are many, including us, who would be interested in getting involved, but who aren&#8217;t willing to face all of those facts. Hence our admiration for the likes of Mr Wesson, the libertarian mummer, who is willing to proceed despite his lack of party affiliation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on General Election 2010: The Man Who Hopes To Oust Cameron by adamwestbrook</title>
		<link>http://journopig.com/2010/03/09/general-election-2010-the-man-who-hopes-to-oust-cameron/#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>adamwestbrook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 09:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journopig.com/?p=865#comment-360</guid>
		<description>As someone who grew up in Witney it&#039;s good to see Mr Wesson having a go. Partly to take some points away from Cameron but mainly because of what it stands for.

Surely, in a healthy democracy, when an election is called we shouldn&#039;t be moaning about the lack of candidates on offer..we should be running! In a healthy democracy the taxi driver or the nurse feel they have a right to stand as much as the communications slimeball or Westminster careerist.

Correct me if I&#039;m wrong but I think the deposit now stands at £500 to enter? Criminally upped from £250 when Thatcher got a scare in the 1980s...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who grew up in Witney it&#8217;s good to see Mr Wesson having a go. Partly to take some points away from Cameron but mainly because of what it stands for.</p>
<p>Surely, in a healthy democracy, when an election is called we shouldn&#8217;t be moaning about the lack of candidates on offer..we should be running! In a healthy democracy the taxi driver or the nurse feel they have a right to stand as much as the communications slimeball or Westminster careerist.</p>
<p>Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong but I think the deposit now stands at £500 to enter? Criminally upped from £250 when Thatcher got a scare in the 1980s&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Tale Of One Freelancer: Revenge, Showing Off, And A Lack Of Imagination by Martin</title>
		<link>http://journopig.com/2010/02/22/a-tale-of-one-freelancer-revenge-showing-off-and-a-lack-of-imagination/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journopig.com/?p=822#comment-359</guid>
		<description>Leaving aside the shoddy standards of journalism at the Mail, this story captures the zeitgeist.
We live in an age where someone can be famous for being famous and where news corporations create the content they report thereby distorting our perception of &#039;real&#039; news.
Take the John Terry &#039;story&#039; for example: the red tops scream about the shenanigans; Sky TV news repeats the flimsy story (&#039;footballer shags mate&#039;s ex&#039; rates a &#039;so what?&#039; at best) and &#039;pressure grows&#039; on the England manager to do something. This self-fuelling goes &#039;round a couple of times, reaches critical mass and Capello sacks the adulterer. Meanwhile the red tops can shriek that &#039;English football is in crisis&#039; - of their manufacture...
Lazy journalism but also a sign o f the times</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leaving aside the shoddy standards of journalism at the Mail, this story captures the zeitgeist.<br />
We live in an age where someone can be famous for being famous and where news corporations create the content they report thereby distorting our perception of &#8216;real&#8217; news.<br />
Take the John Terry &#8217;story&#8217; for example: the red tops scream about the shenanigans; Sky TV news repeats the flimsy story (&#8216;footballer shags mate&#8217;s ex&#8217; rates a &#8217;so what?&#8217; at best) and &#8216;pressure grows&#8217; on the England manager to do something. This self-fuelling goes &#8217;round a couple of times, reaches critical mass and Capello sacks the adulterer. Meanwhile the red tops can shriek that &#8216;English football is in crisis&#8217; &#8211; of their manufacture&#8230;<br />
Lazy journalism but also a sign o f the times</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Local Paper v Hyperlocal: How The Hull Daily Mail Lost The Plot by Max Smith</title>
		<link>http://journopig.com/2010/03/04/local-paper-v-hyperlocal-how-the-hull-daily-mail-lost-the-plot/#comment-358</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 12:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journopig.com/?p=858#comment-358</guid>
		<description>Tom Harris - you need to learn some facts before posting such condescending drivel like your message to Lottie. Further to mark&#039;s reply I would like to point out that in any website there are two elements, the infrastructure (design and code) and the content. Mr Smith was involved, by his own admission and from the HDM&#039;s pathetic investigation, only in producing the infrastructure, NOT the content. It is also perfectly normal for people who build websites for clients to own the domain names because the clients usually do not have the expertise to do that.  Mr Smith&#039;s business is perfectly legitimate, and this whole story stinks of bad journalism and moral bullying. I hope you will now have the good grace to apologise to Lottie for your insulting post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom Harris &#8211; you need to learn some facts before posting such condescending drivel like your message to Lottie. Further to mark&#8217;s reply I would like to point out that in any website there are two elements, the infrastructure (design and code) and the content. Mr Smith was involved, by his own admission and from the HDM&#8217;s pathetic investigation, only in producing the infrastructure, NOT the content. It is also perfectly normal for people who build websites for clients to own the domain names because the clients usually do not have the expertise to do that.  Mr Smith&#8217;s business is perfectly legitimate, and this whole story stinks of bad journalism and moral bullying. I hope you will now have the good grace to apologise to Lottie for your insulting post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Local Paper v Hyperlocal: How The Hull Daily Mail Lost The Plot by mark</title>
		<link>http://journopig.com/2010/03/04/local-paper-v-hyperlocal-how-the-hull-daily-mail-lost-the-plot/#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 04:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journopig.com/?p=858#comment-356</guid>
		<description>Tom Harris someone by the name Kelly has posted me a very similar worded message via my facebook group.  Here is my reply..
 A member of this page has insinuated that one of the websites taken down after HDMs non story was teensinbraces.com. This poster may claim to have info regarding this website. That domain Expired in june 2009 and has not been registered since. According to internet archive resources the domain was only active for one ...month back in march 2007. MAKE YOUR OWN MINDS UP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom Harris someone by the name Kelly has posted me a very similar worded message via my facebook group.  Here is my reply..<br />
 A member of this page has insinuated that one of the websites taken down after HDMs non story was teensinbraces.com. This poster may claim to have info regarding this website. That domain Expired in june 2009 and has not been registered since. According to internet archive resources the domain was only active for one &#8230;month back in march 2007. MAKE YOUR OWN MINDS UP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Local Paper v Hyperlocal: How The Hull Daily Mail Lost The Plot by Journopig</title>
		<link>http://journopig.com/2010/03/04/local-paper-v-hyperlocal-how-the-hull-daily-mail-lost-the-plot/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>Journopig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 15:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journopig.com/?p=858#comment-354</guid>
		<description>We always wonder about how those who list porn websites in detail as part of an argument get their information. First-hand research or just word of mouth?

Our point is that designing websites for a variety of clients - however distasteful those clients may appear - does not make you a pornographer, or a paedophile. It makes you a web designer. 

If would be great if you were able to pick and choose your clients based on how respectable they were rather than how much they paid, but it&#039;s only the lucky few who are economically able to do that.

And we repeat our point. Taking on work for dodgy  people does not entitle a newspaper to call you &quot;sordid&quot; (as the editor did in a quote to Press Gazette) or make other insinuations about you. 

Especially when your paper publishes adverts for equally dodgy clients, again purely because it gets income for doing so. That&#039;s just hypocritical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We always wonder about how those who list porn websites in detail as part of an argument get their information. First-hand research or just word of mouth?</p>
<p>Our point is that designing websites for a variety of clients &#8211; however distasteful those clients may appear &#8211; does not make you a pornographer, or a paedophile. It makes you a web designer. </p>
<p>If would be great if you were able to pick and choose your clients based on how respectable they were rather than how much they paid, but it&#8217;s only the lucky few who are economically able to do that.</p>
<p>And we repeat our point. Taking on work for dodgy  people does not entitle a newspaper to call you &#8220;sordid&#8221; (as the editor did in a quote to Press Gazette) or make other insinuations about you. </p>
<p>Especially when your paper publishes adverts for equally dodgy clients, again purely because it gets income for doing so. That&#8217;s just hypocritical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Local Paper v Hyperlocal: How The Hull Daily Mail Lost The Plot by Neil</title>
		<link>http://journopig.com/2010/03/04/local-paper-v-hyperlocal-how-the-hull-daily-mail-lost-the-plot/#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 15:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journopig.com/?p=858#comment-352</guid>
		<description>Its great to see the support for Paul. But one thing  needs to be pointed out here. Paul did design hardcore pornographic websites, he admitted this to the paper and it also states this on his own website hu17.net - so whatever your views on the newspaper in question,  there is no point using the &quot;he didn&#039;t do it&quot; as a defence, because he has already said he has.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its great to see the support for Paul. But one thing  needs to be pointed out here. Paul did design hardcore pornographic websites, he admitted this to the paper and it also states this on his own website hu17.net &#8211; so whatever your views on the newspaper in question,  there is no point using the &#8220;he didn&#8217;t do it&#8221; as a defence, because he has already said he has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
